Comments for User Experience.UX Design

Comment on Garrett’s State of User Experience by Sean

Sean — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:18:24 +0000

Great presentation indeed. But I wish JJ Garrett will stop sipping water during the presentation… annoying.

Comment on Top Eight UX Design Definitions by durga

durga — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:00:28 +0000

nice job

Comment on Good Design by Dan Williams

Dan Williams — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:12:21 +0000

Good design may or may not think as you do. Good design makes the hard look easy. Good design has nothing to do with I can or I can’t. Good design is relevant to your needs. Good design encourages me to move forward. Good design helps me get to my best without offending me.

Comment on Managers Who Love Design… by kamela kondili

kamela kondili — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:07:05 +0000

the article is amazing
i’m a graphic designer & i always have problems with my manager
but after reading this article some things we’ll change in our communication

Comment on Managers Who Love Design… by Jeff

Jeff — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:29:35 +0000

Nice site. Lots of food for thought.

Comment on Don Norman Video: UX Week by Edward R.

Edward R. — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:00:46 +0000

Thanks, very good, interesting =)

Comment on Garrett’s State of User Experience by Stu Collett

Stu Collett — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:41:55 +0000

Great presentation.

Comment on Applying Successful Recipes by Paul Englefield

Paul Englefield — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:31:46 +0000

I’m a big fan of “methods adoption” workshops; consciously adapting a generic methods approach to a specific design context and building consensus around that approach.

Comment on Top Eight UX Design Definitions by Edward R.

Edward R. — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:44:13 +0000

Hi, me again,

amm, I was doing some research and, mm, what about the one from ISO? the draft the are doing? :p

Comment on Top Eight UX Design Definitions by Edward R.

Edward R. — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:10:55 +0000

Hi, is very cool that you compiled these definitions, the thing is I’ve come here before and the IBM one, def. number 2 is always a broken link for me, is that the same for everyone? or how can I see that definition?, ammm…couldn’t you like do this post giving the definition or a short definition from each link and then give the url for the full article? cause I can’t read the IBM one :p, just a thought.

I say this cause for example the one from “Montparnas” is the definition of the wikipedia one, but still the full article there is the best to explain very simple the whole thing…

And what about other definitions? why are these the more “official” ones? others doesnt’ count that much? :s

Thanks anyway, really appreciate this =)

Edward